Geo-Logic Systems Geo-Logic Systems

 
products
 LithoTect
 Interpreter
 EMAF
 Purchase

LithoTect® Geometry Reconstruction

 Overview
 Current Functionality
 Geometry Reconstruction
 Restoration and Balancing
 Depth Conversion

 
The standard models that are used for reconstructing subsurface geometry fall into two main categories that describe the layers - parallel and similar. Parallel folds are typically associated with contractional fold-thrust structures and maintain a constant bedding-perpendicular thickness. Two combined interpolation/projection models are commonly used for parallel geometries - 'Busk' and dip domain.

The Busk method creates concentric parallel folds by interpolating circular arcs between known constraints, whereas dip domain construction uses angle bisectors to create an angular parallel geometry (i.e., the method of all other commercial reconstruction applications which currently allow parallel projection). Besides interpolating, both methods allow projection of additional horizons away from the interpolating layer.

But both methods have intrinsic problems even for ideal applications - e.g., there are Busk method artifacts associated with the radial centerpoints, and the occasionally extreme geometry of angular bend horizon (although its lack of esthetics is somewhat offset by dip domain's ability to constrain the limits of an interpretation given scattered constraints, e.g., to be as high or low as the extremes shown in the right figure). LithoTect provides the standard dip domain construction, but also has a concentric parallel projector that does not have the problems of Busk construction, as it only uses radial arcs on the convex side of interpolated bends. With the exception of the occasional application of numerical cubic spline interpolators, these are the only two geological horizon interpolators currently available.

<< Back   Next >>

 

Litho Tech